Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

1. The Sapir-Whorf sup persuasion blottot the comprehension of the populace for an individual determines by the background linguistics formation or grammar. In former(a) words, style which use in his or her goal put to work his or her thought, idea, opine of the world. Explanation of this surmise will be more apprehensible by ensamples. heathenish emphasis is virtuoso of the popular examples of Sapir-Whorf surmisal. heathenish emphasis is if a polish A counts more than roughly certain opinion an former(a)(a) culture B, the culture A tends to see more reality of word that the culture B near the aspect.For example, in English words related to family relationship might be 20 or less aunt, uncle, father, engender, nanna, grandfather, great grandm separate or grandfather, son, daughter, cousin, father/m few new(prenominal)wise in law, kin. In contrast, Korea has roughly 70 or more, which is a natural result as Confucianism was widely spread in Korea. some otherwise(a) obvious example to pardon nearly Sapri-Whorf Hypothesis is magazine, and post. In the book, Whorf look at studied to relieve his groundless reckoning with term which is the nearly common n wizns in the English language according to the Lera Boroditskys lecture.The Indo-Europeans (most western sandwich people) lieu the magazine in three major tenses- medieval, throw, and future. thus fara federal agency though past and future is an solicit belief comp ar to present, the language of western people consider past and future s real as present. in that respectfore, the Indo-Europeans adjudge a cultural form of beat unit of measure handsts(century, decade, year, month, imagine solar day, hour, minute dis human existencetle out minutes), and from that form in that location be polar other cultural form as records, histories, calendars, and even stock markets.However, the Hopis has different concept of time target, and subjective. The objective i s a detail which exist, and the subjective is a state is becoming. In other words, rather than past, present, future, in that respect be things becoming that has individual life rhythms akin growing, declining, or changing as plants, weather, or any other form of mother nature does. Therefore, Hopis akinly to view the present (objectives) as becoming (subjective) canful keep back it off to pass. Even Korea, had different concept of time before novelization.People divided a day in 12(based on Zodiac) in other words two hours was the smallest universal unit of time in Korea. So, occasionally, a hero should wait for to the highest degree 2hours. By this cultural difference with western society, create a word Korean Time(organism lazy) during the Korean War and the word is listed on Oxford Dictionary. Lera Boroditsky veritcapable Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis by comparing time and space. She insists that the concept of time order in space differs by culture.Lera obtain shown an e nkindle video clip of 3D spatial jellwork forcet which is arranging time order if there is a dot floating on the air. Koreans whitethorn arrange time exchangeable fall uponfast-lunch-dinner(1-2-3/horizontal order) or breakfast(up)/lunch(mid)/dinner(bottom) in the self-orientated positioning as Korean society had authoritative western literacy of cultivation left to right, alone still has some cultural reap of reading up to bottom. However, the Kuuk family lines answer differs by their direction.They will arrange time as 3-2-1 while go rough north, and will arrange time by 1-2-3 while facing south. This order is delimit by the direction of sunrise and sunset( eastern hemisphere to west) and this is a consequence of a culture of tell hello as where be you liberation and the possible answer for the Kuuk people is outlying(prenominal) over there to the north-north-east or To the whoremonger of south west to clean by hand at south east. In a nutshell, Sapir, and Whorf cl aims people rede their world by their linguistic system which is highly related to culture.By comparing Hopis, Korean and Indo-Europeans, We could acknowledge that he norm of time is different by culture and by comparing Kuuk Thaayorre people, and Korean, we could pack that the arranging time differs by cultural sense of space. Consequently, Sapir-Whorf hypothesis affirmms quite conditionable as individually group of people thinks and acts differently by the form of cultural language. reference point http//fora. tv/2010/10/26/Lera_Boroditsky_How_Language_Shapes_Thoughtfullprogram David S. Thomsons (2011/10/25). The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Worlds Shaped by Words.Retrieved from http//uee. unist. ac. kr/webapps/portal/frameset. jsp? tab_tab_grou p_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_7103_1%26url%3D 2. The critics of Sapri-Whorf Hypothesis had insisted the bond amongst culture and language, doubts the relevancy of soulfulnesss view o f the world. The example of Shona which clan has totally three course of study of colorise does non mean that Shonas eye is psycho pellucidly different and cant see rainbow as English-speakers do. Its conscionable sonorous to speak the definition of the color.Moreover, Whorf probably didnt consider dead allegorys for Hopi language. For example, beau ideal be with you, doesnt mean that psyche will imagine divinity being with him. I do admit that Sapir-Whorf Hypothesiss example has some risk of uncertainties as it is hard to all understand culture of Shona or Hopies for Whorf of other people. However, I do not add together that it Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis is wrong twofold one is the hypothesis is more related to psychical state of people rather than physiologic state and the other is dead metaphor still affects in other musical mode.First, even though it is true that people physiologically that kind eyes atomic number 18 afore man business leadertioned(prenominal), it doesnt mean they recognise at the same way as others. For example there is an experiwork forcet from BBC Do you see what I see that could reject critics concern. A someone from BBC went to the population, Himba. The western experimenter showed 12 colorise which only one color is different. The western mortal have shown 11 colors of no. 80-188-12(red,green, blueweed), and some other color of no. 93-188-2(red,green,blue).Both colors seem green and it is pretty hard to recognize the difference of us nevertheless, the Himba recognize them without hesitation. In another experiment, the western someone has shown 11 colors no. 35-95-65 and one color of no. 35-95-110. To the western, the two colors is apparently divided as blue and green however, this is not the case of Himba folk. And the second experiment seemed handle a mired problem for the Himba. Second, although it is a dead metaphor it still influences in an indirect way of persons view of the world.Even the words God bless you, or God be with you centre just goodish luck, it still influences the view of the world. Though the person isnt Christian, the linguistic system means that there is a culture of Christianity that is recognizable. There is an obvious difference of knowing about Christian and not knowing about Christian. A person knows about Christian heard Im a Christian, he or she whitethorn see the person with some wrong moreover a person who doesnt know about the Christian wint care that much about it. In onclusion, although it is insecure to define another culture from the western view, it doesnt mean that Sapir-Whorf is wrong. As matter of fact, critics concern about physiological view of the eye wasnt related adequate to the problem of human thought, and the dead metaphor still gave influence to the persons view of his or her own world. Reference David S. Thomsons (2011/10/25). The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Worlds Shaped by Words. Retrieved from http//uee. unist. ac. kr/webapps/portal/ frameset. jsp? tab_tab_grou p_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_7103_1%26url%3DBBC HORIZON (2011/08/20) Do you See what I see? www. youtube. com/ trip up? v=4b71rT9fU-I 5. People occasionally see separately other sex as a different creature and we slow have misconceptions about the differences in the midst of. Deborah Tannen argued both women and men much feel they are not getting sufficient credit for what they have done, are not being listened to, are not getting ahead as fast as they should. (p. 64) He explains several(prenominal) conditions why people misunderstand different sex with twofold aspects informal rituals, and strategies.In conversational rituals, Tannen claims men often involve development opposition such as banter, joking, teasing, and arch put-downs, and expending effort to avoid the one-down position in the interaction. while women are often ways of maintaining an appearance of equality, taking into circular the effect of the exchange on the other person, and expending effort to downplay the speakers potence so they can get the melody done without flexing their muscles in an obvious way. For example, men tend to speak quite direct, including emotions, like Hey ChickenGo and clean your teasing the room by contrast, women might choose I think it would be rightfully nice if the room is cleaned even though she thinks the room is dirty and disgusting. Tennen insist custody whose oppositional strategies are interpreted literally may be seen as hostile when they are not, and their efforts to ensure that they avoid appearing one-down may be taken as arrogance. When women use conversational strategies designed to avoid appearing boastful and to take the other persons feelings into account, they may be seen as less confident and competent than they actually are. According to my experience, among friends betwixt men, the conversation between friends includes insult. Usually, the more tr ust, the more insults exist between male friends however, women tends to appraise nearly everything from individually one other, appearance, clothing, make ups, and so on. For instance, there is a famous example of a true-ish tommyrot related to this. There is a couple. The man met his old friend in search of her girlfriend. While being happy clashing with his friend, suddenly, she said Lets break up, I didnt knew you were such a crude person. The man was just masking friendship in a universal way of other men do.In conclusion, men and women are easy to have misconceptions each other as they have their own cultural-like difference between. The gap of between is not only be puzzle of the conversational rituals, but likewise, the strategies they use. Reference Women and Men Talking on the Job, from Talking from 9 to 5 by Debora Tannen. Copyright ? 1994 by Deborah Tannen. 6. The culture of Kula, the Potlatch, and food taboo (pigs in the reading) are seems quite imprudent from th e view of modern society led by western culture. However, it exist whether it is awkward or not for us.Through Marvin Harris logical objective point of view in adaptation, being economic, or being ecological, I would run my possible reason of why these culture exist. In the Milne verbalize Province of Papua New Guinea the 18 island community holds a c drift offd transaction system called Kula or Kula Ring. The Kula was an enclosed trading system for only few old male trading partners from each island were able to participate. With only a large outrigger navigation canoes, the long life-risking voyages were taken for this patronage. And the result of this trade is to have few so-called luxuries which are made out of shells or connatural form.This strange custom that was held between islands far apart had beneficial aspects for the each tribe. First, each tribe can show diplomacy. The bump reciprocity of each tribe overseas, the power of the island tribe is more influential. Second reason is that men of the tribe can have more unity. When people go through with(predicate) a hardship which is people each other feels more unity as more risk was involved in the incident. Through, this dangerous voyage, men in the tribe could have strong unity of divergence through hardship. Lastly, island tribe could have break off economic spot.By using surplus, they could get abstruse and have more stable deliverance of the island tribe. Potlatch is an undated ceremony which is held for incidents to celebrate like sons marriage, the birth of a child, a daughters starting menses, and so on. During the potlatch, tribal leader tenders to other tribe member a bed covering which includes not only providing foods and presents, but also burning or tearing paterfamiliass own property. Marvin Harris explained this as First, it is a feast for unity. And it could actualize his or her status as a patriarch. By showing off in front of other member of the tribe, he could uni fy his tribe by earning respect.As respect could give the cause of gathering more asset of from his tribe member, he could continually gather and lose money and sustain his reputation as a tribe leader. Second, it is a way of bragging his power to other tribe with less blood or war. During Potlatch, other tribe leading occasionally been invited. And the invited leaders have moral duty to frank another Potlatch in his tribe. Through the ceremony, the tribe leader could show the economic function or power of the tribe. Therefore, each patriarch could show better diplomacy to other tribe.Raising hog is one of the most economical ways of getting protein comparing between the amount of meat and the crops consumed. Nevertheless, ledger describe pig as a hellion and not to be eaten. And Islamic variance of Bible is still followed today. Though it seems not rational in present, Qurans taught was greatly reasonable dozen centuries ago. Quran was an enshrined book for the nomadic people in the Middle East which is filled with dessert. For them, piddle is more valuable then diamond. And among the cows that nomadic people raise, pigs were the best consumers of piddle at that moment.Also, pigs that are raise in farms had more economical regard as as they simply dont have to move and burn fat as much the nomadic people do. intimately of all, pigs cannot exertion. They dont have sweat hole as other mammals do. Their adaptations werent for the hot weather itself and easily died in the hot and dry dessert condition. Harriss argument is there is always a very logical reason for a culture whether it is strange or normal. And his logical reasons could be found by an objective point of view such as in adaptation, being economical, or being ecological.References http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Kula_ring http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Trobriand_Islands http//anthro. palomar. edu/economy/econ_3. htm 7. The Native Americans of the groovy intelligible were highly depended th eir lives to buffalos. Buffalos were not only the regularity of food, but almost everything they need shelter, clothing, fuel, tools, weapons, and other equipment by using buffalos horn, skin, and even dung. Nevertheless, the Native Americans of the Great on the face of it never worshiped them. Instead, they worshiped Mother Nature, and Father Sky.In other words, they believed everything living and of nature had a spirit I believe that Marvin Harrison might figure this reason as that buffalos were very large for them, and buffalos were not the only sprit that influenced Native Americans but, most of all, if they have worshiped buffalos, the ritual of hunting devoted buffalos might be thought as taboo. Buffalos economical value exists only by killing them. As they were valuable, but not valuable enough not to kill, the belief of Totemism might have been a great alternative to them. Reference Darko-Adara (2009. 04. 20) Psychology Concert, StarBooks, Seoul http//en. wikipedia. rg /wiki/Plains_Indians http//www. buffalofieldcampaign. org/aboutbuffalo/bisonnativeamericans. html midterm Essay AHS10404 20101695 Lee, Sang-Deok Answered questions 1. Define the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and explain it by giving examples of cultural emphasis. In your answer, refer unique(predicate)ally to the concepts of time and space in your language. Your answer should refer to the reading AND the lecture by Lera Boroditsky (10 points) 2. State how critics of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis criticize the hypothesis and discuss whether you fit out or not, and support your argument with specific examples in your own language (5 points). . set forth Tannens arguments about why men and women misunderstand each other, and find some examples from your experience or from other descents. (5 points) 6. differentiate the Kula, the Potlatch, and food taboo in the readings. How would Marvin Harris (possibly) explain all these cultural practices? Discuss Harris arguments in relation to these t hree practices. (10 points) 7. Native Americans of the Great Plains never worshiped the buffalo. Why not? base on what Harris has written, can you think of reasons why they did not worship the animal that was the source of their food? (extra 3 points)