Chapter 15 discussion questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Chapter 15 discussion questions - Essay ExampleRole clarity amongst followers is warpd by leader role-modeling, and such role clarity can improve a leaders exertion and behavior. Thus, intervening and situational variables are important points of convergence in the study of leader power, behavior and traits. Question 2 The investigate finds that leaders must develop a pattern of necessity interactions to meet the constant demands of subordinates, their get bosses, and the demands of a changing environment. These patterns of necessity interactions are determined by the nature of the work, dependencies and role expectations of different parties and competing demands communicated by followers. They are also determined by the leaders level of authority, the type of unit universe led, external and internal rules of the corporation(i.e. policies, budget), and by the nature of the group situation(i.e. demoralized vs. well-organized followers). Leaders must develop a mental agenda of sho rt-term and long-term strategies to conduct their necessity interactions. These include task-oriented, relations-oriented and change-oriented behaviors. These behaviors deal with getting the air done, building followers commitment to getting the job done, and adapting to changes in the external environment. Research has also make up that the most effective leaders use inspirational capture, make water skills in both referent and knowing types of power, and use power in a ethical way. Leaders with high cognitive, interpersonal and technical skills have been found to be most effective, as are leaders with a socialized power orientation. other finding is that skills are more important than personality traits for effective leadership. Question 3 The suppositionualization of princely leadership consists of a charismatic leader who exerts a unidirectional influence on his followers. This assumption causes the research to be designed to show causality as coming only from the leader s influence on make-upal events. Shared leadership perspective asserts that leadership is a shared process mingled with different leaders at different levels of the organization, between leaders and their superiors, followers and between leader, followers and institutional and intervening variables. The research designed using this perspective must take into account the reciprocal influence of situational and intervening variables on leader behavior, as well as the dynamics of the society in which the organization exists. Question 4 There are limitations to the dyadic perspective. The heroic leader/individual follower concept is in part a result of cultural influences, including the Lone Hero mythology of American individualism. In addition, it is easier in terms of human cognition to understand a single Hero/single Follower construct. scarcely this doesnt take into account the fact that leadership occurs within an organization, a team and a society. It does non explain the reci procal processes at work in the systems that exist within an organization. The open-systems theory asserts that organizations are created to do work that an individual on his own cannot. It takes into account that leadership consists of influencing group processes, including determining the purpose(of a job), how to find out the purpose, membership criteria, and the strictures of the society. In dyadic research, the causal path from leader behavior to follower outcome is commonly direct, and does