Conscientious Objection in an all Volunteer Force Essay

c atomic number 18ful Objection in an all Volunteer Force - Essay ExampleReligious values and beliefs are the imperative reasons that caused the army personnel to fight war against war or other army link activities. During World War I and II, the concern of conscientious objectors, became more acute. Many young conscripts oftentimes mean that it is immoral and unethical to carry arms and ammunition with them as it is contrary to their religious values. As a result, many young men refuse army assistances and decide to undertake other noncombatant services. Sometimes, army personnel who are already working for forces services become conscientious objectors when their principal and beliefs make a paradigm shift. In many countries, there is no official permission from military services departments for military personnel to renounce their participation in war times, option to resign this stockpile and work for civilian services. Under these situations, conscientious objectors of ten confront with punishments, imprisonment, discrimi ground, prosecution etc. In essence, a decision to compel an individual to engage in armed combats and hang the military, hampers the integrity and dignity of homosexual beings. However, certain human rights association realized the sensitivity of conscientious objection issue and created relevant legislations to postulate with such issue. The next paragraph focuses on few legislative actions which consider the sensitivity of the issue. Military selective Service Act states comprehensive descriptions regarding the issue of Conscientious Objection. According to the Section 6 of Military selective Service Act, if a person is not willing to pursue his career in military service due to political, philosophical, religious or social code, he puke pursue noncombatant services. He can perform civilian work by maintaining the safety, health or interest. Council of Europe (1967) had passed a resolution that defended those individuals w ho refused to serve the military for other honest reasons. (Parliament Assembly of the Council of Europe No 337, 1967) Discussion Many authors and practitioners believe that military personnel present opposing views and behaviors to military services not only on the basis of religion, hardly due to other moral values as well. The study of Milenkovic (2003) states that besides having the religious reasons, more often citizens refuse to work for army services because of political, philosophical, moral, and ethical concerns as well. Current Situation After the insurgent World War, Roman Catholic countries and traditions especially, Belgium, France, Spain, Italy, Austria and Portugal legally recognized conscientious objection. On the other hand, countries belonging to communism regimes did not permit the legalization of this act. After the plunge of communism, many European Countries now recognize these acts by allowing conscientious objection and further spread it to other continent s and countries. End State Goals In some authors guide on of view, there should be no permission of the idea of conscientious objection due to numbers of reasons. each nation aims to consolidate the number of army personnel of their country as it is very constructive and important for the security and sovereignty of the whole nation. The larger the number of military personnel, the safer will be the sovereignty of the nation as a whole. Possible Alternate Outcomes for the Current Situation The current situation allows conscientious obj